Blockchain in Russia is not deliberately decentralized


The Blockchain is NOT decentralized

Blockchain in Russia is not deliberately decentralized

Blockchain in Russia is not deliberately decentralized

  • The Russian authorities will not agree to the creation of a full-fledged decentralized blockchain

  • A centralized registry is the ideal tool for juggling parameters

  • European countries will become the leaders of the integration of the canonical blockchain into the state system, Golubitsky believes

International consortium of news organizations developing transparency standards.

Blockchain without decentralized qualities is turning into the most convenient tool for manipulating elections, says Sergei Golubitsky

Domestic developments of blockchain technology for elections deliberately do not have decentralized properties. Sergey Golubitsky, author of the and projects, wrote about this in the author’s column for Novaya Gazeta. According to Golubitsky, the created Russian variants of the blockchain are in fact an ordinary corporate distributed network:

Blockchain in Russia is not deliberately decentralized

“It cannot be otherwise, because otherwise the state will completely lose control over the voting results, which, as you understand, is absolutely unacceptable for the authorities that govern an archaic society without democratic traditions.”.

At the same time, the blockchain without direct decentralization is a convenient tool for “manipulating elections”.

Join our telegram channel to keep abreast of the main trends in the crypto market.

Pandora’s Box

Golubitsky emphasizes that a centralized blockchain network is an ideal platform for unlimited manipulation of any parameters. The controlled blockchain network can easily provide any necessary election outcome.

However, Golubitsky still believes that the blockchain can be used for its intended purpose. For Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to be an electronic database system distributed across multiple network nodes, or to enjoy popular trust, society itself must rationalize the technology. Golubitsky believes that the leaders in this direction will be primarily European countries, including France, Germany and Sweden..

“I think that the most technologically advanced voting methods here will be adapted without fanfare and solemn reports in the near future.”.

Despite the fact that blockchain is not yet used in voting in the United States, election results are already recorded on a distributed ledger. The editorial staff of BeInCrypto previously reported that one of the largest international information and news agencies Associated Press will provide the results of the US presidential election for storage on the blockchain of the startup Everipedia.

Blockchain in Russia is not deliberately decentralized

Learn how to trade in the cryptocurrency market with BeInCrypto partner – the StormGain cryptocurrency exchange

In Russia and Ukraine, the use of blockchain is already in use, although it leaves more questions than answers. In September, Rostelecom made available the source code of the remote electronic voting system (DEG) of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation, which immediately found flaws in the form of centralization of nodes, as well as the impossibility of checking the correctness of the vote count. In Ukraine, the head of the State Geocadastre of Ukraine believes that international donor funds were “well laundered” with the help of blockchain in the cadastral market.

What do you think? Share your thoughts with us in the comments and join the discussion in our Telegram channel.


All information contained on our website is published in good faith and objectivity, and for informational purposes only. The reader is solely responsible for any actions he takes based on the information received on our website..

Share Article

Similar articles

Similar articles